Knowledge about post-anoxic somatosensory evoked potentials--present or not?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Median nerve somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) recordings play an important role in outcome algorithms in comatose patients after cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Knowledge of technical difficulties, clinical implications and uniform interpretation of SEP recordings is crucial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the skills of neurologists to interpret SEP recordings in post-anoxic patients. METHODS: Nationwide Dutch clinical neurophysiology examinations from 2007, 2008 and 2011, containing SEP related questions, were analysed. Participants were classified as neurology residents, neurologists with less than 10 years of experience, neurologists with more than 10 years of experience and clinical neurophysiologists. End-points were the knowledge of all participants about SEP recordings per year as well as improvement in knowledge over the years, as reflected by the test scores. RESULTS: A total of 194 participants completed the examination in 2007, 200 in 2008 and 263 in 2011. Between 2007 and 2008, all groups of respondents showed a significant increase in percentage of correct answers to SEP questions. Sixty-six participants completed all three examinations. The SEP score of this group improved in 2008 [75%, interquartile range (IQR) 50-75, P < 0.001] compared with 2007 (38%, IQR 38-50); there was no further improvement in 2011 (69%, IQR 54-77). CONCLUSION: Continuing education about technical knowledge, possible pitfalls and interpretation of SEP recordings remains of utmost importance.

Somatosensory evoked potentials during mild hypothermia after cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

OBJECTIVE: In patients who remain in a coma after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), the bilateral absence of cortical N20 responses of median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) 24 hours after admission invariably correlates with a poor neurologic outcome. Nowadays, CPR patients are treated with mild hypothermia, with simultaneously administered sedative drugs, hampering clinical neurologic assessment. We investigated whether SSEP performed during hypothermia can reliably predict a poor neurologic outcome. METHODS: Between July 2006 and April 2008, this multicenter prospective cohort study included adult comatose patients admitted after CPR and treated with induced mild hypothermia (32-34 degrees C). SSEP was performed during hypothermia, and in patients who remained comatose after rewarming, a second SSEP was performed. Neurologic outcome was assessed 30 days after admission with the Glasgow Outcome Scale. RESULTS: Seventy-seven consecutive patients were included in 2 hospitals. In 13 patients (17%), the cortical N20 response during hypothermia was bilaterally absent. In 9 of these 13 patients in whom SSEP could be repeated during normothermia, the N20 response was also absent, yielding a positive predictive value of 1.00 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70-1.00). All 13 patients with absent SSEP during hypothermia had a poor neurologic outcome, yielding a positive predictive value of 1.00 (95% CI 0.77-1.00). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this pilot study show that bilaterally absent cortical N20 responses of median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials performed during mild hypothermia after resuscitation can predict a poor neurologic outcome. We started a larger multicenter prospective cohort study to confirm these results.